Now I am not in the business of hating anyone and the royals do not escape this statement. The queen like me is a living sentient being the racist husband of the so called monarch is also a living sentient being. However there are some poignant, salient differences, the most obvious being that I did not swear to protect the people of this country, the queen DID!
In the Coronation ceremony of 2 June 1953, one of the highlights was when The Queen made her Coronation Oath (taken from the Order of Service for the Coronation).
The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath by first asking the Queen,
Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?And the Queen answering, "I am willing."
The Archbishop ministered these questions:
Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?
Queen. "I solemnly promise so to do."
Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?
Queen. "I will"
.
Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?
Queen. "All this I promise to do."
Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible as she kneels upon the steps, and saying these words:
"The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God."Then the Queen kissed the Book and signed the Oath.
AND I didn't know about the ramifications of either of the treatise (Maastricht or Lisbon) and given the choice I would not have supported either.
The Treaty of Maastricht (formally, the Treaty on European Union, (TEU)) was signed on 7 February 1992. The Treaty of Maastricht made the Queen subject to the European Union and a citizen of that Union ‘subject to the duties imposed thereby’.
The EU Constitution - which will come into force on 1st January 2009; ('Lisbon Treaty')
The 'Lisbon Treaty' is a constitution; A country cannot have two constitutions.'
Anything else? that gives us a clue that the laws don't apply to our glorious leaders. Here's one to watch out for.
It is concluded that under European law excluding Princess Anne from becoming monarch in favour of a male is sex discrimination, then this will directly conflict with the Act of Settlement 1701, and thus domestic law.
I started with Charlie, Veitch that is, so I am going to GLUE the two subjects together.
Just exactly what does 'suspicion of conspiracy to cause a nuisance' mean, on the scale of things?
On the one hand we have a constitutional monarch who totally neglects her subjects by signing away our rights and she (the bitch) is at liberty and is 'NOT under arrest', don't know if we could do that anyway, on the other hand; Charlie says he will ignore an injunction, or whatever, to attend a 'WEDDING' and is ARRESTED!
What has this to do with the queen and the marriage?
It was those who serve the queen who arrested Charlie AND because her grandchild was getting married.
Had this not been the case, Charlie would have not been arrested.
For those who don't 'give a SHIT' just wait till it's your turn.
When the police deny YOU the right to a solicitor and your wife / partner or your solicitor is not allowed to know where you are or how long you are going to be held - forget asking 'WHY' you are arrested 'they don't have to tell you'.
It was on THIS day that a PINEAPPLE was well and truly stuffed up the arse of the british (Albion) public. Consider yourself 'FUCKED'.
What can we do?
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”[Edmund Burke, 1770, in 'Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents.'].
No comments:
Post a Comment