Norman Scarth

There are those out there who would rather let this man rot in gaol, I, for the record am NOT one of them.
Why would it be that some would rather this happen and I NOT?

Because Norman has a 'CRIMINAL' record.

Yes, he has a criminal record. And what he did was wrong. However did he have a chance?
What about our illustrious leader Cameron 'Call me Dave'.
As a young man, he was in a gang that regularly smashed up private property. Do we see or hear about his exploits? No he is 'SQUEAKY CLEAN' or so the LACK of proceedings against him say in their absence. Just goes to show what rich parents and connections can do for an up an coming 'WANKER'.

No, Norman barricaded himself in his house, although I am not abreast of the actual details on the circumstances, only norman can say. He was under the threat of eviction and set about protecting his right to remain in a house where he was settled.
"In 1999, the executors of a 'late Mr Denis Roberts' began proceedings against Norman to recover possession of a house at Gledhow Park Grove, Leeds, where he was living.
Norman disregarded the court order to quit, and a warrant was issued for possession, and he was warned that bailiffs would be attending on June 20 last year."

What is certain is that Norman used barbed wire and all manner of things to make entry into the house very difficult. Here is a man who was adamant he was not going anywhere and the authorities did what they know to do best they 'ATTACKED' they used intimidation in the first instance and then started to use fear of court action and when that failed they used, as always, physical abuse.

Was Normans actions illegal? it is a mute point, we do not know if the court warrant to seize goods and house was legitimate and as we know from experience most of these warrants are fraudulently produced to save time and money, one has to be careful when tackling these fraudsters, they will tell you they have the right but under close scrutiny we find they have not, 95% of the time.

The authorities 'bailiffs'  (certificated) not the pretend contracted court appointed bailiffs have authority and powers that are regulated however this authority does not include assault, and if they themselves are under threat they are trained to either deal with it or walk away. In Normans case they gained entry but was warned if they continued they would be harmed. Bear in mind this is in the 'OCCUPANTS' living quarters and at the time Norman was 75, there were 2 police officers and two bailiffs, now confronting an old man who was not in any way going to allow them to evict him, so he started up a chainsaw and wielded it a anyone close by as a warning and as a direct attack on those now inside the property.
Was he 'MAD' at the time? I would think he was bloody furious, he just wanted to stay where he was and have no interference - However don't forget we have a right in our constitution to have adequate housing and we the right to defend our property by whatever means necessary.

Norman may have taken his rights a little too far, but those in attendance that day could have simply backed off and come back another day or at least continued with negotiations. But they didn't they went in 'GUNG HO' and got burned in the process. Articles state that those bailiffs are unable to work since this incident. I suggest they were not fit for the job in the first place, they were under the impression they could do just as they wish with no repercussions, PLUS they accept orders that they themselves cannot verify because they are inadequately trained in what a WARRANT; a true warrant is.

Norman did time for this event he concluded his sentence after 4 years to my knowledge so in the true meaning of freedom Norman paid for his crime. Everyone in this case were scarred including Norman, NO! not poor Norman, he broke the first rule of the freeman principal, 'Do no HARM' however in this loaded financial crazed system we have it was not Norman who was the problem it was that the authorities could not get the finances that would have been generated from gaining access to a 'HOME' regardless as to who was put out in the street as a result. 'MONEY before PEOPLE', so who can really blame Norman for what he did, I cannot condone it, but I can sympathyse with his actions, he was up against a well oiled machine that he had helped pay for and the funds are perpetual.

Does his current sentence have anything to do with his past behaviour?

Apparently it does.

Judge Mawrey referred to Normans past conviction; a conviction that Norman paid for by his loss of liberty.

"Judge Mawrey described Mr Scarth as a man convinced he was the victim of a conspiracy, which was tested further upon conviction of wounding in 2001 and served four years in prison, followed by two years in a psychiatric hospital."

He said: “In Mr Scarth’s universe he is the noble fighter for justice and the rule of law who, despite appalling levels of official persecution, has refused to be silenced and continues the struggle, bloody but unbowed. In the real world, inhabited by the rest of us, Mr Scarth is a disturbed, clearly paranoid and occasionally violent old man who is a persistent minor public irritant.”

I SAY

quoting Socrates and two famous Quakers. 

There is no breach of the peace if what is said is merely offensive. 

Lord Justice Sedley further states: “Free speech includes not only the offensive, but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative, providing it does not tend to provoke violence.”

 So For whatever reason, Norman Scarth, a naval war veteran who helped defeat the forces of Fascism and Nazism, decided to make a covert audio recording of a particular hearing , so Normans recent activity in court;  requires ALL his past misdemeanour's to be brought into the open and sentenced accordingly?

Norman broke the law in that, it was illegal, NOT 'unlawful'; of this there is no doubt. But six months incarceration for an 85-year-old: it breaks the man. And when you consider that some of our former MPs who fiddled the taxpayer of tens of thousands of pounds were sentenced to less, there is slight disquiet and sense of disproportionality.

Either we push for Normans sentence to stand or have him released, I prefer the latter however I cannot hide the fact that if his sentence was to follow through to the whole of the six months a reveiw of the sentences given to the MP's should follow.
What do you say 6 MONTHS for using a mobile phone in court is equivalent to 6 YEARS for an MP fiddling his expenses.
This is very tempting.

Namaste, phil;

Norman Scarth protest Leeds prison and senataph war memorial

We did norman of the scarth family proud the crowd was not too large however it was large enough to get our message out.
Those who could not attend missed a great event, all present expected police in numbers however there were, in total, two police (regular) and four specials. All of whom were informed of our purpose and the peaceful nature of our protest. My hat tip to the police for not being there.

There were many from around our country, we paraded banners kindly created for us, sorry I cannot remember all the names yet in the true nature of the Freeman all was shared, sandwiches were made and transport provided; the free norman bus, big red double decker.

We stood at the side of the road outside the prison and were often 'HOOTED' in support as well as being at the main gate. This part of the protest was pretty quiet but the message was given. I am sure norman was in his element inside his cell.
norman asked us to finalise the protest at the war memorial in Leeds, which we did. We all clamoured on the bus and made our way to the memorial and it was here that much photo and video was taken, we were not quiet and I mean 'we were NOT quiet'. My voice is still a little creaky after shouting to all the passers by. The megaphone was put to good use so all those in the vicinity 'KNEW' just what it was we were campaigning for. Many leaflets were handed out and we played normans speech to great effect through the megaphone.

The camaraderie was awesome and we discussed many subjects throughout the day.

We reached a large audience and put many points across re the corruption of our judicial system - again with relief there was little sign of the boys in blue. I believe because we are known not to be violent and are protesting a cause that is just and proper.

For those that were there well done, for those that could not make it, I am sure there will be ample opportunity in the future and I do believe you wished you could be there. The thought counts as much in my book but it would have been better if you could have got there, you would have had a great time and met some wonderful people.

Namaste, phil;
By the way norman had his pastoral visits denied so I was unable to get a visit. Just another turn of the screw for norman but he is made of stern stuff.

Not 'sleeping' they are comatose

You know what? The post a few days ago - Below 'SAY NO MORE' About the cabbage.
Yes that one. I printed it out and spoke to a few people about the madness behind the whole control thing and what did quite a few have to say.

Well maybe they are trying to make it easier for the growers.
The procedures have to be strict so we get good quality food.
I don't think there are that many words, not just for a cabbage, maybe there are a number of different cabbages.
We can't just let 'anyone' sell cabbages there has to be rules.

WHAT!
I thought that article was MADNESS but the responses I have had are sheer lunacy.

We truly do live among the most simple people on the planet, These guys are not 'sleeping' they are comatose.
I had to write this because if I kept this to myself 'in my head' I believe it would just blow up.

Well as you might have guessed I put them right on a few things, needless to say they went away 'INFORMED'.

Get back to ya later

Namaste, phil;

Read the article below by Geoffrey Lakeman an excellent piece of reporting, although it would have landed on his lap due to the seriousness and coverage it has.
Here we have a child protection official who was employed to monitor church groups to ensure paedophiles did not get into the groups. Okay they found 'ONE'; the official himself.
Now correct me if I am wrong. He is known to have uploaded / distributed pornographic images of children, FACT. This indicates that he is aware of other groups and individuals - He is in the loop: take it as read he knows the ins and out regardless of what he wishes to admit.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put 2 and 2 together here - How many of these groups 'HAVE' paedophiles in them? The very official who was employed to monitor these groups would have sympathy for other paedophiles.


The answer to this problem we have now is to prosecute the church for not vetting applicants properly. THEY and 'they alone' put the children in their care in danger. Start at the very top and FIRE their asses, they get the salary for doing the job and they get the responsibility - so here it is 'YOUR FIRED'.
Gaol the paedo but fire the CEO of whatever church hired him.

Church child protection chief caught with 4,000 child porn pictures

by Geoffrey Lakeman, Sunday Mirror 31/07/2011
A child protection official for the Catholic Church has been caught with 4,000 pictures of child porn.
Father-of-four Christopher Jarvis was arrested after uploading pictures of children being abused to a website.
Married Jarvis, 49, a former social worker, was employed by the church following sex scandals about pervert priests.
His job was to monitor church groups to ensure paedophiles did not gain access to children in the church’s congregations.
But he was caught by police in March with more than 4,000 child porn images on his home computer and his work laptop.
He admitted 12 counts of making, ­possessing and distributing indecent ­images when he appeared before ­magistrates in Plymouth and is likely to face jail when he returns to court for sentencing next month.
Jarvis, who has been sacked from his job as child safeguarding ­officer, worked the Diocese of ­Plymouth for nine years.
Church spokesman ­David Pond said: “Mr Jarvis was suspended from his position as soon as the diocese became aware in March of the police investigation.
“The Bishop took that action and since then the Church has worked closely with the police.”

It is the bit about being caught in march and left at liberty until now that I don't get. He had 4000 dirty pics of children and STILL he is at liberty until next month. WHAT! More to the point he was only suspended - NOT fired. Oh yes they sack hi now - I cannot think of any reason that a person should have 4000 dirty pictures of children on his PC at HOME and on his WORK laptop and no one raises the 'FIRE THE DIRTY BASTARD' Flag. 6 MONTHS and he STILL is not in goal.


From now on anyone in a position of responsibility HAS to be accountable. 'WE the PEOPLE' have no recourse to 'IGNORANCE' so neither should the authorities - Police - Judges - Lawyers - If it is GOOD for US then it is GOOD for you. As anonymous puts it:

We are Legion, 

We do not forgive, 

We do not forget,

Expect us.

The above goes for the government as well. The time is coming quick where we will expect THEM to abide by the very rules they have placed us under.
These rules (ACTS & STATUTES) no longer apply to us but before they finally go we will use them against those who seek to destroy us.
And then we will do it again with 'Common Law'.



Remember this, those who voted to go to WAR will be asked to go the countries that they invaded to 'WORK' and 'PHYSICALLY rebuild those countries. Their families and their families family will supply all the labour that will be required to ensure those who have suffered from their 'LAZY' sycophantic voting are restored and repaid - even if it takes 50 generations it WILL be done.

Fuck 'EU'

'FUCK OFF'

And when you get there 'FUCK OFF AGAIN'

Say no more

All you Need to Know about Government Bureaucracy

Tuesday, 02 August 2011 09:43

Pythagorean theorem: 24 words.

Lord's prayer: 66 words.

Archimedes' Principle: 67 words.

10 Commandments:179 words.

Gettysburg address: 286 words.

US Declaration of Independence : 1,300 words.

US Constitution with all 27 Amendments: 7,818 words.

EU regulations on the sale of cabbage: 26,911 words.

Thanks to D Icke Headlines (Fair use notice assumed)

I officially declare myself an anarchist.

It has been a long time coming and not exacly what I had envisaged.
However an opportunity has arisen where I can, finally, set myself up to become a martyr.

I had intended and researched the heretic laws of witchcraft otherwise known as the 'Witchcraft Acts'

"In England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland a succession of 'Witchcraft Acts' have governed witchcraft and provided penalties for its practice, or (in later years) for pretending to practise it." From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia

The law was repealed in Britain in 1951, however mutterings have been heard that the 'Witchcraft Acts' or heresy laws are to be reintroduced.

So it was because of these rumours I began to do my research and would have declared myself a witch if they were ever reintroduced. I just might have been the first to be burned at the stake in 450 years.
Well this is not to be, the new 'THOUGHT CRIME' has come first so.
I would like to officially declare myself an anarchist.

1 "Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy. Any information relating to anarchists should be reported to your local police."

Without question I consider the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful'. I definitely promote a stateless society, or *anarchy.
You now have information relating to an anarchist and by rights you should report me to your local police.

2 *anarchy: A theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.

However, I believe the police are going to be busy, at my last reckoning there would be roughly half the population of britain and ALL of 'Albion' that are anarchists. I will be in 'GOOD' company.

'twas until this day that I was lawfully able to think whatever I wished, mark this day well because it is going to become a point in history where we should all remember where we were and what we 'HAD' / 'HAVE' done to put an end to this madness.
I had the pleasure of being in the court room at Birkenhead and witnessed the treasonous activities of Judge Peake first hand.I have gathered with others and have discussed the traitorous activities of this and prior governments. I have met and can confirm that Hollie Grieg tells her truth and I believe this truth. I have met and spoken with many who have brought charges of treason to the police regarding Edward Heath, Harold Wilson, Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and 'call me Dave' Cameron among others.
I know and understand 'Common Law' and I know and understand the 'Magna Carta 1215'. I believe and can never be indoctrinated against my, and others, beliefs in these valuable documents.

This makes me an ANARCHIST and I will wear that badge of honour regardless of what the authorities say and do. I do NOT FEAR these little men who produce nothing but HOT AIR and I refuse to be bullied by the police, HIT me HURT me TORTURE me - They trained me in the cream of their forces and I have survived such techniques before and I will remain steadfast in my beliefs.

To steal another groups' ethos:

I am Anonymous. (one of the many where they are few)


I do not forgive.


I do not forget.


I am coming.


Expect me.












What more can we do?

If we see a policyman in trouble we should just walk on by. ^Only help 'Constables' NOT police 'OFFICERS'
If we see a politician who needs assistance we should just walk on by. ^Only help those who have and are supporting our cause.

All medical treatment for these traitors should cease 'NOW'. ^As per above.
Any and all assistance to these people should stop. Do NOT serve a politician and do not serve a policyman in your shops and or be directly rude to them if one has to serve them - let them go elsewhere. ^As per above.

When you see a policyman 'TURN YOUR BACK ON THEM' until they have passed to show solidarity to the 'We the People'. ^As per above.

We may not have the equipment and orders they have but we can 'VISIBLY' ignore them.
See a cop car driving on the street 'STOP' and turn your back on them.

Show them all we are not amused.

Magna Carta 1215; Article 61

But since we have granted all these things aforesaid, for GOD, and for the amendment of our kingdom, and for the better extinguishing the discord which has arisen between us and our Barons, we being desirous that these things should possess entire and unshaken stability for ever, give and grant to them the security underwritten;
namely, that the Barons may elect twenty-five Barons of the kingdom, whom they please, who shall with their whole power, observe, keep, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties which we have granted to them, and have confirmed by this our present charter, in this manner:
that is to say, if we, or our Justiciary, or our bailiffs, or any of our officers, shall have injured any one in any thing, or shall have violated any article of the peace or security, and the injury shall have been shown to four of the aforesaid twenty-five Barons, the said four Barons shall come to us, or to our Justiciary if we be out of the kingdom, and making known to us the excess committed, petition that we cause that excess to be redressed without delay.
And if we shall not have redressed the excess, or, if we have been out of the kingdom, our Justiciary shall not have redressed it within the term of forty days , computing from the time when it shall have been made known to us, or to our Justiciary if we have been out of the kingdom, the aforesaid four Barons, shall lay that cause before the residue of the twenty-five Barons; 
and they, the twenty-five Barons, with the community of the whole land, shall distress and harass us by all the ways in which they are able; that is to say, by the taking of our castles, lands, and possessions, and by any other means in their power, until the excess shall have been redressed, according to their verdict; saving harmless our person, and the persons of our Queen and children; and when it hath been redressed, they shall behave to us as they have done before.
And whoever of our land pleaseth, may swear, that he will obey the commands of the aforesaid twenty-five Barons, in accomplishing all the things aforesaid, and that with them he will harass us to the utmost of his power: and we publicly and freely give leave to every one to swear who is willing to swear; and we will never forbid any to swear. 
But all those of our land, who, of themselves, and of their own accord, are unwilling to swear to the twenty-five Barons, to distress and harass us together with them, we will compel them by our command, to swear as aforesaid.
And if any one of the twenty-five Barons shall die, or remove out of the land, or in any other way shall be prevented from executing the things above said, they who remain of the twenty-five Barons shall elect another in his place, according to their own pleasure, who shall be sworn in the same manner as the rest.
In all those things which are appointed to be done by these twenty-five Barons, if it happen that all the twenty-five have been present, and have differed in their opinions about any thing, or if some of them who had been summoned, would not, or could not be present, that which the greater part of those who were present shall have provided and decreed, shall be held as firm and as valid, as if all the twenty-five had agreed in it: and the aforesaid twenty-five shall swear, that they will faithfully observe, and, with all their power, cause to be observed, all the things mentioned above.
And we will obtain nothing from any one, by ourselves, nor by another, by which any of these concessions and liberties may be revoked or diminished. And if any such thing shall have been obtained, let it be void and null: and we will never use it, neither by ourselves nor by another.

Let it be KNOWN that I phil; of the dawson family hereby swear allegiance to the Barons, formally willfuly given to the Queen (Elizabeth II). My allegiance to the crown is hereby withdrawn and will be restored once this land witnesses the redress required. I have sent this affidavit to the queen - hereto is further affirmation of my allegiance to the Barons.